December 6, 2009

Empire or Humanity?

What the Classroom Didn't Teach Me about the American Empire.
By Howard Zinn
Narrated by Viggo Mortensen
Art by Mike Konopacki
Video editing by Eric Wold



Democracy - "a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections."

No form of government is acceptable where one person or one group of people control and have power over other people. The number one role of any government is to obey the will of the masses, and to stop powerful groups of people from harming or abusing the masses.

December 5, 2009

The New Roman Republic?

By Adel – PeaceMaker
December 5, 2009


The framers of the American constitution loved the Romans. They built their government buildings to look Roman. They named the principle lawmaking body "the Senate" after the Romans. They chose the eagle as their national symbol. They even called their new system of government a republic, using a Roman word instead of an English word like commonwealth or a Greek word like democracy. Why if Thomas Jefferson could hear us calling America The New Roman Republic, he would dance a happy dance and hug anyone who made the comparison.

The American Republic established in 1776, like the Roman Republic which was established around 509 BC (probably be more of a military dictatorship today), is trying to conquer everything in sight or install puppet regimes in exchange for military support. By way of comparison, the diplomatic communities of today counts Pakistan, South Vietnam, Kuwait and South Korea (some guilty of terrorism, war crimes, human rights abuses) as independent countries, but they only exist because the United States keeps troops planted there.

The present wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have proven that the military might of the United States vastly overshadows anything else the world has to offer. Not only can the Americans clobber other countries, but they can do so with an almost trivial sacrifice in lives. American soldiers face more risk from friendly fire and accidents than they do from opposing forces.

American hegemony will remain unbroken for the next generation or two. There will be setbacks here and there, like the Iranian Hostage Crises, Mogadishu or Lebanon, where a sudden upturn in the body count makes the US reconsider the wisdom of getting involved overseas, mere insults to national dignity rather than defeats.


Generally, the Roman and American fought wars roughly paralleled to each other. The partial list that follows is an example of this analogy:

298-290 BC
Third Samnite War: The Samnites were last major native opponents of the Romans in Italy.

1803-1853
Trans-Mississippi West: The US expands west to the Pacific Ocean and south to the Gulf of Mexico at the expense of the Indian Tribes and Mexico.

280-275 BC
Pyrrhic War: First Roman war against a non-Italian army.

1898
Spanish-American War: First overseas war of conquest by the US.

264-241 BC
First Punic War: First acquisition of overseas territories (Sicily, Sardinia).

1914-1918
First World War (WWI): One of the largest wars in history. More than 15 million people were killed, making it one of the deadliest conflicts in history.

218-201 BC
Second Punic War: The invasion of Italy.

1939-1945
Second World War (WWII): The most widespread war in history. Over 70 million people, the majority civilians, were killed, making it the deadliest conflict in human history.

200-197 BC
Second Macedonian War: Marked a significant stage in increasing Roman intervention in the affairs of the eastern Mediterranean.

1945-1991
The Cold War & the USSR break-up: The continuing state of political conflict, military tension, and economic competition existing after WWII (1939–1945), primarily between the USSR and its satellite states (the USSR collapse into independent nations began in 1985), and the powers of the Western world, including the United States.

191 BC
Battle of Thermopylae: Was a major battle of the Second Punic War.

2001-Stil Ongoing
September 11 attacks (9/11): The US responded to the attacks by launching the War on Terrorism, invading Iraq & Afghanistan, and enacting the Patriot Act.

"Rome finally fell after about a thousand years"

In England, Colin Powell was asked by the Archbishop of Canterbury if our plans for Iraq were just an example of empire building by George Bush.

He answered by saying that, "Over the years, the United States has sent many of its fine young men and women into great peril to fight for freedom beyond our borders. The only amount of land we have ever asked for in return is enough to bury those that did not return." -- Widely circulated e-mail.

Modern historians tend to shy away from passing moral judgments on the past, the wholesale destruction of Iraq will be considered to be the point at which the United States went bad.

December 3, 2009

Oppression and Domination

By Adel – PeaceMaker
December 3, 2009

Only once the occupying powers are driven out, will there be the possibility of democratic development.


The first response is that there's always a double-standard in the moral outrage about "criminals" and "terrorists". Nobody credible in the mainstream media would suggest that the US president is a terrorist or a criminal.

The United States, under the leadership of pretty much every president, has been responsible for hundreds of times more deaths than any terrorist organization that you might care to name. Bush alone must bear responsibility for the deaths of hundreds upon hundreds of thousands in Iraq and Afghanistan. Clinton bombed Serbia, Sudan, Afghanistan, Iraq and, of course, Somalia. Obama, fixing to send another 34 thousand troops to Afghanistan - and at $1 million dollars each, you can bet they won't be playing video games. They'll be killing people wholesale.

Surely we must be against killing. It’s a commandment from God/Allah himself. We created laws against it. We condemn it. But we don't condemn all killing. We have war memorials to commemorate the occasions of mass slaughter that punctuate our history. We're told to "support our troops", which always means "shut up and support the killing of foreigners in a war somewhere else."

The USA is the most powerful empire in world. It has bases in more than 100 countries. Its military spending alone makes up more than half of the total world military spending. Its economy is the world's largest. It controls the key international economic institutions in the world, the IMF, the World Bank, etc. It has invaded more countries and overthrown more governments than any other country in history.

From these two facts - oppression and domination - I draw two conclusions. The first is that the actions of the oppressed to alleviate their conditions are not the same as those of the dominant powers.

The second point, it is this: that the application of universal values is politically useless to understanding the world, to providing a just framework for action, and to maintaining a coherent, non-deceitful value system.

The actions of the United States are designed to strengthen and affirm the present set-up, in other words their dominance. Thus, their invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, their support for the Ethiopian dictator, the Jordanian dictator, the Egyptian dictator, the Israeli apartheid regime, etc., are about sustaining domination. They run directly counter to democracy and self-determination.

Democracy and self-determination is necessary for the full development of any nation. Weakening the forces of any imperial regimes, their allies and clients, or other imperial powers at the very least creates more autonomy for the potential of democratic maturity. Only once the occupying powers are driven out, will there be the possibility of democratic development.

December 2, 2009

Why We Don’t Condemn Our Pirates in Somalia

This is a Follow-up to “The truth behind the Somali Pirates” that I posted on December 01, 2009. The following is an insightful article by K’Naan, a Somali-Canadian poet and musician, offers his perspective with the context of recent Somali history and ongoing “Western” activities off the Somali coast. It is important to take notice of the fact that much of the coverage of Somalia has been either lightly-obscured or not-so-lightly-obscure racism by the mainstream media. The current piracy originated out of impulses for community self-defense and direct action against neoliberalism by the African masses. Luckily, voices like K’naan and others like him expose this logic for the bull sh*t it really is.

Can anyone ever really be for piracy? Well in Somalia, the answer is: it's complicated.


Can anyone ever really be for piracy? Outside of sea bandits, and young girls fantasizing of Johnny Depp, would anyone with an honest regard for good human conduct really say that they are in support of Sea Robbery? Well in Somalia, the answer is: it’s complicated.

The news media these days has been covering piracy in the Somali coast with such lopsided journalism that it’s lucky they’re not on a ship themselves. It’s true that the constant hijacking of vessels in the Gulf of Aden is a major threat to the vibrant trade route between Asia and Europe. It is also true that for most of the pirates operating in this vast shoreline, money is the primary objective. But according to many Somalis, the disruption of Europe’s darling of a trade route is just Karma biting a perpetrator in the butt. And if you don’t believe in Karma, maybe you believe in recent history. Here is why we Somalis find ourselves slightly shy of condemning our pirates.

Somalia has been without any form of a functioning government since 1991. And despite its failures, like many other toddler governments in Africa, sprung from the wells of post-colonial independence, bad governance and development loan sharks, the specific problem of piracy was put in motion in 1992.

After the overthrow of Siyad Barre, our charmless dictator of twenty-some odd years, two major forces of the Hawiye Clan came to power. At the time, Ali Mahdi, and General Mohamed Farah Aidid, the two leaders of the Hawiye rebels were largely considered liberators. But the unity of the two men and their respective sub-clans was very short-lived. It’s as if they were dumbstruck at the advent of ousting the dictator, or that they just forgot to discuss who will be the leader of the country once they defeated their common foe. A disagreement of who will upgrade from militia leader to Mr. President broke up their honeymoon. It’s because of this disagreement that we’ve seen one of the most devastating wars in Somalia’s history, leading to millions displaced and hundreds of thousands dead. But war is expensive and militias need food for their families, and Jaad (an amphetamine-like stimulant) to stay awake for the fighting. Therefore a good clan-based Warlord must look out for his own fighters. Aidid’s men turned to robbing aid trucks carrying food to the starving masses, and reselling it to continue their war. But Ali Mahdi had his sights set on a larger and more unexploited resource, namely: the Indian Ocean.

Already by this time, local fishermen in the coastline of Somalia have been complaining of illegal vessels coming to Somali waters and stealing all the fish. And since there was no government to report it to, and since the severity of the violence clumsily overshadowed every other problem, the fishermen went completely unheard. But it was around this same time that a more sinister, a more patronizing practice was being put in motion. A Swiss firm called Achair Parterns, and an Italian waste company called Progresso, made a deal with Ali Mahdi, that they could dump containers of waste material in Somali waters. These European companies were said to be paying Warlords about $3 a ton, where as in to properly dispose of waste in Europe costs about $1000 a ton.

In 2004, after Tsunami washed ashore several leaking containers, thousand of locals in the Puntland region of Somalia started to complain of severe and previously unreported ailments, such as abdominal bleeding, skin melting off and a lot of immediate cancer-like symptoms. Nick Nuttall, a spokesman for the United Nations Environmental Program, says that the containers had many different kinds of waste, including “Uranium, radioactive waste, lead, cadmium, mercury and chemical waste.” But this wasn’t just a passing evil from one or two groups taking advantage of our unprotected waters, the UN Convoy for Somalia, Ahmedou Ould-Abdallah, says that the practice still continues to this day. It was months after those initial reports that local fishermen mobilized themselves, along with street militias, to go into the waters and deter the Westerners from having a free pass at completely destroying Somalia’s aquatic life. Now years later, that deterrence has become less noble, and the ex-fishermen with their militias have begun to develop a taste for ransom at sea. This form of piracy is now a major contributor to the Somali economy, especially in the very region that private toxic waste companies first began to bury our nation’s death trap.

Now Somalia has upped the world’s pirate attacks by over 21 percent in one year, and while NATO and the EU are both sending forces to the Somali coast to try and slow down the attacks, Blackwater and all kinds of private security firms are intent on cashing in. But while Europeans are well in their right to protect their trade interest in the region, our pirates were the only deterrent we had from an externally imposed environmental disaster. No one can say for sure that some of the ships they are now holding for ransom were not involved in illegal activity in our waters. The truth is, if you ask any Somali if they think getting rid of the pirates only means the continuous rape of our coast by unmonitored Western vessels, and the production of a new cancerous generation, we would all fly our pirate flags high.

It is time that the world gave the Somali people some assurance that these Western illegal activities will end, if our pirates are to seize their operations. We do not want the EU and NATO serving as a shield for these nuclear waste-dumping hoodlums. It seems to me that this new modern crisis is a question of justice, but also a question of whose justice.

“As is apparent these days, one man’s pirate is another man’s coast guard.”

December 1, 2009

The truth behind the Somali Pirates

By Adel - PeaceMaker
December 01, 2009


In Somalia right now the US is holding millions hostage, refusing to allow food aid because it might get into the hands of the Islamist al-Shabab movement that is winning the war against the heavily-subsidized and heavily armed (by the US) the Transitional Federal Government (TFG) in Mogadishu. Even Foreign Policy Magazine has an article condemning the policy, concluding with the following:

The U.S. government is holding the Somalia relief enterprise and its beneficiary’s hostage to its counterterrorism policy... Until Washington lets [aid] agencies fulfill their mission unhindered, the U.S. mission to win "hearts and minds" in Somalia, a feared up-and-coming stronghold of terrorism, will be completely undermined. Knowingly allowing millions of people to suffer is no way to win friends.

Somalia's pirates are indubitably – even the mainstream media acknowledge this - a response to the lack of a central government to police the waters of the Somali basin, and the devastating poverty of that country. The action of seizing boats might seem extreme but since the pirates aren't recognized as a legitimate sovereign authority, they are forced to use coercion. If we're honest, all state transactions – including taxation and tariffs – are rooted in the threat of violence (whether physical or financial) against the subject. So, the pirates, without the benefit of legal recognition, are applying the threat.

Part 1


Somalia is a country that is suffering because of the continued meddling, manipulation, invasion, and bombardment. The USA supports the dictator Siad Barre. They invaded to prevent Mohammad Farah Aideed from consolidating his power. They supported the Ethiopian invasion which forced the Union of Islamic Courts out of power, after they had brought a modicum of stability to the country. And now they are arming and backing a group that has no support outside of a few neighborhoods in Mogadishu.

Part 2


"The actions of the Somali Pirates have a democratic component to it – they are attempting to overcome the effects of imperialism and to affirm their right to self-determination and sovereignty."